Cultural appropriation is often defined as the ‘taking of intellectual property, cultural expressions or artifacts, history, and ways of knowledge.’ Despite this apparent link to intellectual property, legal issues are only rarely mentioned in the current debate. Thus, to start with, this article aims to fill this gap by identifying the possible bases in existing laws that may, at least in principle, justify claims of unlawful behaviour. As far as ethical considerations are concerned, the article then notes a deep divide between those who fully endorse the notion of cultural appropriation and those who are resolutely opposed to it. This article aims to give fair consideration to both sides of the argument, suggesting three categories of potentially unethical conduct. On this basis, the article finally revisits possible legal responses from a normative perspective.
Keywords: law and culture, ethics, intellectual property, tort law, freedom of speech, identity politics
JEL Classification: K00, K13, K20, K38, O34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Siems, Mathias, The Law and Ethics of ‘Cultural Appropriation’ (February 3, 2019). (2019) 15 International Journal of Law in Context 408-423, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3531196 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3531196
Via Bolognese 156 (Villa Salviati)
Firenze, 50139
Italy
Top Floor, Judge Business School Building
Trumpington Street
Cambridge, CB2 1AG
United Kingdom
c/o the Royal Academies of Belgium
Rue Ducale 1 Hertogsstraat
1000 Brussels
Belgium